Guidelines for Publishing in Journals or Open Source Journals
-
Laboratories
-
Hospitals, using patients records and/or clinical trials
-
Field study with or without questionnaires
-
Computational research
-
Resources (if writing a book or a research review)
-
Blue prints of a proto-type/new design/invention
-
Accidental eureka
-
Other non-listed but ethical findings
-
Appropriate TITLE that is descriptive of the core findings but not too long
-
Name of lead author and all research partners in the appropriate order along with footnotes stating the affiliation of each of the author and co-authors
-
Abstract or summary of around 250 words that lists the core research, findings, and possible agreement or disagreement with available literature. Note the there should be no use of numbers of listing of any references of any kind in the Abstract
-
Introduction or background, this section should have all information available on the topic in at least the last five years of published articles. One assumes that a researcher would have done this literature search part at the very early stages prior to conducting the actual research. This part is as important as the actual research especially to avoid any later surprises that the work has been published before!
-
Methodology when appropriate, some research involves more elaborated methodology than other. In this section the researcher states all methods used to collect data and must provide all details of methods of collection which would allow the reproducibility of the research.
-
Results such as Data analysis, graphs, figures, sketches,…etc should be represented in this section following a logical/chronological scheme that makes it easy for the reader to follow the explanation given in conjunction with the analyzed data/case,…etc
-
Discussion of results at this point the manuscript flow is winding down and it will be very important to show how this work contributed to the arena of research in the specific field and to compare to actual available findings and how relevant or irrelevant your findings are. Also in this section an author could include and pitfalls or suggest improvement for possible future research.
-
Conclusion, an author could have this section as a standalone section or it could be inclusive with the section of discussion
-
Acknowledgements, appropriate to mention the names and contribution of persons whose work does not warrant listing them as co-authors but they have very crucial contribution and input that helped in supporting the researchers and bringing the research to life
-
References or bibliography. This is a very difficult task and must decide which style to follow based on which Journal you will be submitting the manuscript to. Some journals will require that references be listed in an alphabetical order, others require the use of footnotes and numbers, some use both,…etc. We would like to re-iterate that an author must consult the actual guidelines of the specific Journal.






